In our previous note, we had identified June 10–11 as crucial breakout dates — and the market responded with remarkable precision. Nifty formed a top on June 11, and once the day’s low was breached, the index tumbled more than 500 points across Thursday and Friday, delivering on both the price and time dimensions of our forecast.
We also marked June 16 (+/- one day) as an important time-based cycle date. In alignment with this projection, June 13 — just one session prior — witnessed a sharp 300-point gap-down, once again validating the strength of time-based forecasting.
Our level-based analysis also played out with exceptional accuracy:
Support at 24,535 was highlighted — the week’s low came in at 24,508, nearly spot on.
Live Events
The 25,085 zone was flagged as key resistance — and on June 9, 10, and 11, the day’s lows consistently hovered around this level, proving its technical significance.Our Time Analysis throughout the week further reinforced the power of price-time confluence:June 9: Day high and swing high formed around 11:20 AM & 12:30 PM
June 10: Swing low occurred near 11:00 AM, close to our 11:20 AM window
June 11: Nifty top aligned precisely with our 12:10 PM & 1:15 PM forecasts
June 12: Both the day’s high and low were captured around 9:30 AM & 2:00 PM
June 13: The day’s low and high aligned closely with 9:20 AM & 1:30 PM
Such consistent hits highlight how combining price and time can offer traders a distinct edge, enabling high-accuracy tactical trades.
Levels to Watch – Nifty Spot:
Supports: 24,480 | 24,443 | 24,380 | 24,142
Resistances: 24,850 | 24,980 | 25,085 | 25,322
Traders are advised to use these levels in conjunction with the time zones to optimize their intraday and swing trades.
In volatile environments like these, the blend of precision timing with price action becomes more critical than ever. Our approach continues to deliver tactical clarity and market edge for active traders.
(The author is Director, Wealthview Analytics Pvt Ltd)
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
